Journal Article

E Derek Taylor, Melvyn New, and Elizabeth Kraft (eds). The History of Sir Charles Grandison Available for Purchase

E. Derek
 
Taylor
,
Melvyn
 
New
, and
Elizabeth
 
Kraft
(eds).
The History of Sir Charles Grandison
. By
Samuel
 
Richardson
. 4 Vols. Pp. 3000 (The Cambridge Edition of the Works of Samuel Richardson).
Cambridge
:  
Cambridge University Press
,
2022
. Hardback, £400.
The Review of English Studies, Volume 74, Issue 315, June 2023, Pages 567–569, https://doi.org/10.1093/res/hgad032
Published:
12 April 2023
Article history
Received:
23 February 2023
Editorial decision:
20 March 2023
Accepted:
28 March 2023
Corrected and typeset:
12 April 2023
Published:
12 April 2023

Extract

Richardson’s prolixity is legendary. The sheer physical heft of his collected work posed a challenge: when confronted with ‘19 Volumes in Twelves, close Printed—In Three Stories—Monstrous!—Who that sees them ranged on one Shelf, will forgive me?’ (xxxix), he fretted. While modern readers often plead ‘TLDR’, being unwilling to excuse the extended psychological vacillations and moral qualms of his heroines, contemporary admirers begged the author for yet more of his fictions. Richardson’s final novel, The History of Sir Charles Grandison (1753–54), was partly the product of readers’ requests for a good man to complement his virtuous heroines. Yet, despite being Jane Austen’s favourite novel, Grandison has remained out of favour with readers and critics alike. This is partly due to the lack of a good critical edition. Unlike Clarissa and Pamela, which have both benefitted from affordable and readily available paperback editions, Grandison was last available in Jocelyn Harris’s 1986 edition. Though not quite a classroom text, her Oxford University Press edition granted Grandison a small but growing demographic of academic readers committed, possibly perverse, and compelled by Richardson’s story of the divided love of a painfully perfect hero, told in letters by a roster of women correspondents significantly livelier than Sir Charles himself.